The Restaurant Test

Decide whether a conversation belongs in this setting before deciding what to say

What you will make

Practice the idea that a conversation can feel familiar or trusting while still being an unsuitable place for some information. Learners compare settings and choose a safer version or route for a specific task.

By the end, you can distinguish a topic from the setting where it is discussed, explain why a setting changes the risk, make a conversation safer without declaring every use inappropriate, and identify when a human or approved organizational process is needed.

Lab materials

Use during the lab

• Documents
  • Fictional scenario cards: The Restaurant Test Required · Markdown · Fictional scenarios for comparing disclosure choices across settings.
• • Lab Notebook Interactive · An optional place to record the work and download a local copy.
• • Learner guide Markdown

Go deeper

• Related articles
  • A Helpful Conversation Is Not Automatically the Right Setting Article
• • Facilitator guide Markdown

Before you start

Level and format: Zero / Beginner; individual, pair, or small group

You need: scenario cards, a surface for sorting, and no live account or chatbot. Use only the fictional scenarios; do not disclose real records or account settings.

The core idea

A helpful conversational partner is not the same thing as a private environment. A crowded restaurant, shared office, family group chat, personal account, and approved organizational tool create different conditions. This exercise does not certify any product or setting. It helps learners pause, reduce unnecessary detail, and choose an appropriate next step.

Compare the same request in two settings

Complete the activity here. Open the optional Lab Notebook beside this page when you want a place to record your work.

1. Name the Settings

   Review the setting cards:

   • a conversation with a trusted person at a private table;
   • a crowded restaurant;
   • a shared office or shared device;
   • a family group chat;
   • a personal consumer chatbot account; and
   • an approved organizational tool, when the organization has confirmed it is appropriate.

   No setting is simply “safe” or “unsafe.” The task, detail, people involved, account, policy, and possible consequences matter.

2. Sort a Scenario

   Choose a fictional scenario card. For each setting, sort it into one of these responses:

   • Reasonable as stated — the task and amount of detail fit the setting.
   • Possible after a safer rewrite — remove or generalize details first.
   • Use an approved route or human process — the setting is not enough for the task as stated.
   • Pause and verify — you need policy, consent, account, or factual information before deciding.

3. Explain the Difference

   Choose two settings for the same scenario. Explain what changes: who may gain access, what information is unnecessary, whether the account or tool is approved, and what a safer alternative would preserve.

4. Create a Safer Route

   Write one of the following:

   • a less detailed version of the request;
   • a question that should go to the responsible person or organization; or
   • a decision to keep the task outside a general conversation.

   Do not try to solve medical, legal, financial, employment, customer, or other consequential decisions in this activity.

Check your result

• Compare your record with the source and the stated task. Name what the result supports, what remains uncertain, and what must be checked by a person or authoritative source before anyone acts.

• A polished result is not proof that it is accurate, complete, safe, or appropriate. Keep unresolved questions visible and verify consequential claims outside the tool.

You are done when

Which setting felt trustworthy but was not appropriate for the details? What change preserved usefulness? What did you need to verify rather than assume?

Done means you can compare one scenario in two settings, name a meaningful difference, and propose a safer route without treating privacy as an all-or-nothing rule.

• The fictional scenario I selected
• The actual task
• The first setting and sharing choice
• The second setting and sharing choice
• The meaningful difference between settings
• A safer rewrite or route
• A question for a responsible person

Try another version

These are optional extensions, not additional completion requirements.

• Compare a personal device with an approved workplace tool
• Change only the audience and reassess what is necessary
• Ask a partner to explain the meaningful difference
• Create a third setting where the correct choice is to stop

Learner Map

Tracks

• AI Literacy for the Rest of Us

Modules

• Conversational Privacy

Help us improve this Activity

Tell us what helped, what slowed you down, or what you needed but could not find.

🎓 Give learner feedback