Gallery contribution guidance

The Gallery holds finished, reviewable examples. Each entry should help a learner see the reasoning path, not simply present a polished script.

Include these parts in Markdown:

1. contributor name or validated anonymous attribution, plus a clear provenance label;
2. the scenario, listener, and the exact 45-second opening prompt;
3. a short material-question exchange that gathers the useful distinctions;
4. an explicit alignment check: what the explanation is really about, what must remain true, and what the chat tool must not invent;
5. the request for a first draft, the first draft, and a specific human refinement direction;
6. the refined, timed script and a brief explanation of why it works.

Do not fabricate a conversation. A reconstructed collaboration must say that it is an edited reasoning path rather than a verbatim transcript. An illustrative learning model must say that it is not a record of a particular chat.

Every Gallery entry also gets a local review page before it is complete. Its Markdown and JSON downloads identify the lab and example so reviewers can return feedback without an account or a network submission.

Privacy and accessibility check: remove names and unpublished plans; get consent for voices; include a transcript for audio or video; and identify differences with words rather than color alone.

---

Source: labs/forty-five-seconds-to-make-it-clear/gallery/contribution-guide.md